<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTDTLS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/</link>
	<description>Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/comment-page-1/#comment-14835</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/#comment-14835</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His “low-art = Beethoven” view confused me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re talking to a non-music major, but maybe he was a pioneer for the popular arts?  Beethoven&#039;s musical ranking aside, I am not sure if I totally agree with that line of thinking.  I believe that historically the high-brow vs. low-brow distinctions have much, if not more, to do with class than the actual art in question.  This has perpetuated the idea that high culture is a path to salvation, which is totally humanistic.  Pretty soon people think that only high-art is worthy of regard/contemplation/worship/etc. and that popular arts don&#039;t warrant any sort of serious Christian discernment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His “low-art = Beethoven” view confused me.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re talking to a non-music major, but maybe he was a pioneer for the popular arts?  Beethoven&#8217;s musical ranking aside, I am not sure if I totally agree with that line of thinking.  I believe that historically the high-brow vs. low-brow distinctions have much, if not more, to do with class than the actual art in question.  This has perpetuated the idea that high culture is a path to salvation, which is totally humanistic.  Pretty soon people think that only high-art is worthy of regard/contemplation/worship/etc. and that popular arts don&#8217;t warrant any sort of serious Christian discernment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/comment-page-1/#comment-14830</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transformatum.com/2007/11/06/htdtls/#comment-14830</guid>
		<description>Does this mean we are going to have to start singing from the Psalter at Church?..


His &quot;low-art = Beethoven&quot; view confused me.. but I did like John&#039;s thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean we are going to have to start singing from the Psalter at Church?..</p>
<p>His &#8220;low-art = Beethoven&#8221; view confused me.. but I did like John&#8217;s thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

